Abstract library

485 results for "classification system".
#895 Determination of a Prognostic Classification System in Metastatic Grade 1 and 2 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs)
Introduction: There is no clinical prognostic risk stratification tool available for metastatic grade 1 and 2 PNETs, which are a heterogeneous group.
Conference: 11th Annual ENETS Conference (2014)
Category: Pathology, grading, staging
Presenting Author: MD Julen Fernández Plana
#955 Usefulness of the WHO Classification and of the ENETS TNM Staging System to Predict Prognosis in Patients with Rectal NENs
Introduction: WHO classification and TNM staging system have been proposed for rectal neuroendocrine neoplasia (NENs). However, their prognostic accuracy is not validated yet.
Conference: 11th Annual ENETS Conference (2014)
Category: Epidemiology/Natural history/Prognosis - Descriptive epidemiology
Presenting Author: Professor Gianfranco Delle Fave
#1657 Establishment of Japan NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society and Its Registration System
Introduction: In 2012, many nation-wide gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, surgeons, radiologists and pathologists have established Japan NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society (JNETS) in Japan. JNETS is now composed of 304 institutes.
Conference: 14th Annual ENETS conference (2017)
Category: Epidemiology/Natural history/Prognosis - Registries, nationwide and regional surveys
Presenting Author: M.D., Ph.D. Toshihiko Masui
Authors: Masui T, Imamura M, Ito T, Unno M, ...
#627 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Two Different TNM Staging Systems
Introduction: Several staging systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) exist but the most appropriate one has not been defined.
Conference: 10th Annual ENETS Conference (2013)
Category: Pathology, grading, staging
Presenting Author: Elena Martin-Perez
#1239 Histological Classification of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: Optimising the Ki67 System
Introduction: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are graded using the Ki67 antigen in accordance with the WHO 2010 classification. Despite the system’s widespread use, a wide variety of tumour behaviours have been described leading to various proposed revisions.
Conference: 12th Annual ENETS Conference (2015)
Category: Pathology, grading, staging
Presenting Author: Logan Mills
Keywords: G3
#1908 Staging Classification Comparison of Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (pNETs) Utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB)
Introduction: The staging classification of pNETs remains a matter of debate and no obvious superior system has emerged.
Conference: 14th Annual ENETS conference (2017)
Category: Pathology, grading, staging
Presenting Author: Gustavo Westin
#134 Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: tumor characteristics and long-term clinical outcome in the German NET registry
Introduction: Prognosis of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been difficult to predict due to heterogenous tumor biology, various classification systems, and lack of reliable and recent data due to the rarity of these tumors.
Conference: 7th Annual ENETS Conference (2010)
Category: Clinical
Presenting Author: Dr. Ulrich-Frank Pape
Authors: Maasberg S, König A, Rinke A, Anlauf M, ...
#2939 Prognostic Evaluation for Gastroenteropancreatic NEC: AJCC or ENETS Staging Classification or Others?
Introduction: For poorly-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEP-NEC), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recommends to use a classification different from that for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor. However, this is not adopted by European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) staging classification.
Conference: 17th Annual ENETS Conference (2020)
Category: Pathology - grading, staging
Presenting Author: Professor Jie Chen
Authors: Zhang Y, Chen L, Lin Z, Zhang T, ...
#3005 Comparison between Tang and WHO 5th Edition Grade Classification for Goblet Cell Adenocarcinomas
Introduction: Appendiceal GCAs (previously Goblet Cell Carcinoids) are composed of cells with secretory phenotypes. Several grading systems to predict behaviour are available (e.g.Tang). The latest WHO 5th edition adopted a grading system similar to colon adenocarcinomas.
Conference: 17th Annual ENETS Conference (2020)
Category: Pathology - grading, staging
Presenting Author: MD, PhD Jorge Barriuso
#935 A Three Tier Grading System Based on Ki-67 Index, Mitotic Count and Necrosis with Cut-Offs Specifically Generated for Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors is Prognostically Effective and Accurate
Introduction: Lung neuroendocrine tumors are catalogued into four categories by the World Health Organization (WHO 2004) classification. Its reproducibility and prognostic efficacy was disputed. The WHO 2010 classification of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms is based on a Ki-67 index and has proved prognostically effective.
Conference: 11th Annual ENETS Conference (2014)
Category: Pathology, grading, staging
Presenting Author: Professor Guido Rindi
Authors: Rindi G, Klersy C, Inzani F, ...
Close
Notice

Dear conference participant,

Thank you for participating in the ENETS Virtual Conference 2020!

You now have the opportunity to view the webcasts, abstracts and e-posters via My ENETS. Don't miss on any of the exciting talks and take your time to view the clinical and basic science abstract sessions.

If you require a certificate of attendance, please log into My ENETS and select “Annual Conferences” from the side menu, then click on “My registrations” and select your registration for 2020. Please choose "Certificate o.A." to receive your certificate of attendance.

A note on CME accreditation:

ENETS has been liaising with UEMS regarding CME accreditation for the virtual conference. At present, we do not have a definitive answer. We will keep you updated.

 

Wishing you all the best,

The entire ENETS team