Introduction: Lung neuroendocrine tumors are catalogued into four categories by the World Health Organization (WHO 2004) classification. Its reproducibility and prognostic efficacy was disputed. The WHO 2010 classification of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms is based on a Ki-67 index and has proved prognostically effective.
Aim(s): To compare the two classifications and to define a new prognostic grading system for lung.
Materials and methods: Three-hundred and ninety-nine patients who underwent surgery and with at least one year follow-up between 1989-2011. Twenty-one variables were collected and performance of grading systems and their components compared by Cox regression and multivariable analyses; all tests were two-sided.
Conference: 11th Annual ENETS Conference 2014 (2014)
Category: Pathology, grading, staging
Presenting Author: Professor Guido Rindi
To read results and conclusion, please login ...
Further abstracts you may be interested in