Capecitabine-Temozolomide in G3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Abstract #1405
Introduction: There is no standard second line treatment for G3 neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). The sensitivity to platinum combinations of G3 NENs with a Ki67 < 50% remains unclear.
Aim(s): We hypothesize that capecitabine-temozolomide (CAPTEM) could be a valid option in this setting.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of NEN patients treated with CAPTEM in 12 sites in Spain between June/2008 and October/2015.
Conference: 13th Annual ENETS conference 2016 (2016)
Category: Medical treatment - Chemotherapy
Presenting Author: Guillermo Crespo Herrero
Authors:
Crespo G H, Lopez C, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Matos I, Capdevila J, Custodio A, Carmona-Bayonas A, Alonso T, Gajate P, Aller J, Navarro M, Sevilla I, Alonso V, Nieto B, Barriuso J
To read results and conclusion, please login ...
Further abstracts you may be interested in
#709 Temozolomide and Capecitabine: An Effective Combination in Metastasic G2 NETs
Introduction: Treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with chemotherapy has been validated in different studies. Recently a retrospective trial demonstrated high and durable response rate with Temozolomide and Capecitabine in 30 pancreatic NETs (pNETs).
Conference: 10th Annual ENETS Conference 2013 (2013)
Category: Medical treatment - Chemotherapy
Presenting Author: María Jesús Barrio
#1389 Capecitabine and Temozolomide in NETs G1-2: The Experience of Various Hospitals in Spain
Introduction: Treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with capecitabine-temozolomide (CAPTEM) is an option yet to be confirmed in phase III trials.
Conference: 13th Annual ENETS conference 2016 (2016)
Category: Medical treatment - Chemotherapy
Presenting Author: Guillermo Crespo Herrero
Keywords:
capecitabine, temozolomide
#1911 Histological Differentiation Provides Useful, Additive and Independent Prognostic Information to Proliferation Index in G2 and G3 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs)
Introduction: The WHO 2010 classification has provided a valuable tool to stratify NEN prognosis based on an objective measure, the proliferation index. However, morphology and, in particular, tumor differentiation, is emerging again as a relevant feature that should not be dismissed due to its important clinical implications.
Conference: 14th Annual ENETS conference 2017 (2017)
Category: Pathology, grading, staging
Presenting Author: MD-PhD Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
Keywords:
WHO 2010 classification
#2248 High Grade (G3) Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Should the New WHO Classification Apply to All?
Introduction: Grade 3 (G3) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), arising from the gastro-entero-pancreatic system (GEP), are classified according to WHO 2010 and defined as having a Ki67 of > 20%. However this groups together G3 well differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (WD-NET) with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (PD-NEC). Recently, WHO have proposed a new classification for pancreatic NEN, with sub-division into G3 WD-NET and G3 PD-NEC
Conference: 15th Annual ENETS conference 2018 (2018)
Category: Pathology - grading, staging
Presenting Author: Dr Dalvinder Mandair
#2888 Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate Endpoint in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated with Somatostatin Analogues
Introduction: Progression-free survival (PFS) has been used as surrogate endpoint in phase III trials with somatostatin analogues for gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). However, this endpoint has not been validated in this scenario.
Conference: 17th Annual ENETS Conference 2020 (2020)
Category: Medical treatment - others, not specified
Presenting Author: Alberto Carmona-Bayonas